Sources, Regional Patterns, and Trends

The primary sources of black carbon (BC) emissions are the residential, transportation, and industrial sectors. The residential sector is the largest contributor to BC emissions, accounting for approximately 48% of global BC emissions in 2017 (Figure 2.1). Residential sector BC largely comes from the use of solid fuels such as wood, charcoal, agricultural residues, dung, and coal for heating and cooking, which is still widespread in low- and middle-income countries, where approximately 2.4 billion people, or one-third of the global population, rely on it.

Figure 2.1 — Anthropogenic sources of BC emissions. Data source: CEDS GBD-MAPS

Image
Chart

The transportation sector is the next largest source of BC, accounting for 24% of global emissions. It is emitted from a variety of sources, but most of the emissions are from diesel vehicles – including ships – which produce higher levels of BC due to their combustion process. BC emissions from transportation can be significantly reduced by retrofitting older diesel engines with diesel particulate filters (which can remove up to 95% of BC), using low-sulfur fuels, or replacing diesel with hybrid and electric vehicles. 

Industrial BC emissions arise mainly from brick kilns, industrial boilers, and coke ovens used in iron and steel production. China, India, and countries in Central and South America are the primary contributors to industrial BC emissions. Industries in developed countries have managed to reduce BC by adopting a combination of measures including fuel switching, enhanced combustion processes, and strict air quality regulations. Industrial emissions could be reduced by phasing out beehive coke ovens, transitioning from traditional brick kilns to vertical shaft brick kilns, and promoting end-of-pipe dust removal facilities.

Open biomass burning, wildfires, and controlled agricultural burning are also significant contributors to BC emissions. Wildfires, in particular, introduce substantial quantities of BC particles into the atmosphere, especially in the Arctic. In parts of Asia, Africa, and South America, agricultural burning releases large amounts of BC into the atmosphere.

Image
Dry rice paddy burning

Black carbon and other pollutants being emitted from the burning of a dry rice paddy in India.

Credit: Credit: rvimages / iStock

To identify geographical sources and trends we chose two recent datasets – the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS GBD-MAPS) and the Peking University global emissions inventory (PKU-FUEL) – that provide country-level and sectoral BC emissions from 1970 to 2017.

BC emissions inventories have a notable amount of uncertainty due to a variety of factors constituting a significant barrier to mitigating emissions. While there is an urgent need to improve estimates, existing inventories can still be useful, particularly when developing short-term mitigation strategies. We have provided a brief comparison between the two inventories used here and other major inventories here

2.1.  Highest Emitters

There are large country variations in BC emissions – both in terms of the amount and sources of emissions. Global BC emissions are dominated by China and India, which together account for one-third of global anthropogenic emissions, followed by Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria. These five countries together account for half of total global BC emissions, as shown in Figure 2.2. For India, Nigeria, Indonesia, and Brazil, the proportional sectoral contributions between the two datasets (PKU-FUEL and CEDS GBD-MAPS) are in broad agreement with each other. However, for China, according to the PKU-FUEL inventory, industrial BC emissions are the country’s single largest source of BC. But according to the CEDS GBD-MAPS inventory, China’s residential and energy sectors are a substantially larger source of BC emissions than industry. This discrepancy might result from the low emissions factors used in the CEDS GBD-MAPS inventory for the industrial sector.

Figure 2.2 — Black carbon emissions broken down by sector for the top 20 highest-emitting countries in 2017. Data: (A) PKU-FUEL and (B) CEDS GBD-MAPS. (DRC: Democratic Republic of Congo)

Image
Chart

In several countries, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Angola, Russia, Indonesia, Brazil, and Canada, forest fires – natural and uncontrolled – and agricultural burning are also significant sources of BC (Figure 2.3). For example, it has been estimated that Siberian fires contributed almost half of all BC deposited in the Arctic over a 12-year period from 2002 to 2013. Similarly, a recent study reveals that savannah burning in sub-Saharan Africa is a significant contributor to BC emissions.

Figure 2.3 — Wildfire-related black carbon emissions for the top 20 highest-emitting countries in 2017. Data: PKU-FUEL. (DRC: Democratic Republic of Congo; CAR: Central African Republic)

Image
Chart

2.2.  Regional Patterns

Aggregating countries reveals large variation in the sources of BC emissions at a regional level. Transportation is the largest contributor to BC emissions in North and South America, Europe, North Africa, and Central Asia, accounting for approximately half of total emissions, as shown in Figure 2.4.

In East Asia, BC emissions are relatively equal across all three major sources – transportation, residential, and industry.

In the Middle East, BC emissions are dominated by the transportation and industrial sectors, the latter being associated with fossil fuel activities in the region’s oil-rich Gulf countries. 

In South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, which together account for about 38% of global BC emissions, the residential sector stands out as the primary source of BC. Notably, the residential sector in sub-Saharan Africa is responsible for more than 75% of the region’s BC emissions due in large part to the combustion of unclean fuels for cooking and heating.

Figure 2.4 — Percent contribution of various sectors to 2017 black carbon emissions by region. Data: PKU-FUEL

Image
Chart

2.3.  Black Carbon Hotspots

A small number of locations are responsible for a disproportionately large amount of BC emissions. For example, as shown in Figure 2.5, around 20% of global BC emissions are concentrated in eastern China and the Indo-Gangetic Plain. By elucidating the regional and sectoral hotspots of BC emissions, stakeholders can take a targeted approach to deploying solutions that will quickly and significantly reduce BC while maximizing human and environmental well-being. 

In China, industrial activities, residential fuel combustion, and transportation all contribute heavily to BC emissions. The Indo-Gangetic Plain, encompassing regions in northern India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, emerged as the most substantial hotspot for residential emissions, accounting for approximately 25% of the sector’s BC emissions globally. Reductions across the Indo-Gangetic Plain will not only reduce BC exposure for more than 60 million people but would also reduce BC deposition in the Himalayas and the Hindu Kush mountains thereby slowing glacier melt. Residential hotspots are also observed in densely populated regions of eastern Indonesia and southern Nigeria.

Figure 2.5 — Spatial distribution of global annual black carbon emissions in 2017. The light blue lines in the ocean are black carbon emissions associated with global shipping. A, B, and C: Hotspots in eastern China, the Indo-Gangetic Basin across India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, and Nigeria, respectively. Data: CEDS GBD-MAPS.

Image
Map

Urban metropolises situated in Uganda, Egypt, Ethiopia, and South Africa represent significant anthropogenic BC hotspots within the African continent, with residential and transportation activities being the predominant sources of emissions. Collectively, these locations account for a significant portion of Africa's overall emissions.

Oil-producing Gulf countries like Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Iraq exhibit high BC emissions from the oil and gas sector which is co-emitted with methane. Notably, per capita emissions are particularly high for these countries, underscoring the disproportionate impact of oil and gas operations on BC emissions.

Shipping is responsible for approximately 2% of global BC emissions which would make it the fifth largest contributor if it were a country. The impact of shipping-related BC is particularly pronounced in the Arctic and northern latitudes, where these emissions have detrimental effects on fragile ecosystems and Indigenous communities. Worryingly, the quantity of BC emitted within the Arctic region has doubled between 2015 and 2021, primarily due to increased shipping activity in adjacent waters.

Finally, major urban centers globally, such as Rio De Janeiro, New York City, Mexico City, and London, are BC hotspots due to the extensive number of vehicles operating within these metropolises.

2.4.  Global Trends

Human activities resulted in emissions of about 5 terragrams (Tg) of BC per year between 2000 and 2017. During the same period, wildfires and agricultural burning are estimated to have contributed between 2–2.5 Tg of BC per year. BC emissions have not shown a consistent increasing or decreasing trend over the last two decades, as shown in Figure 2.6. According to the PKU-FUEL dataset, global anthropogenic BC emissions have remained consistent at around 5.7 Tg per year. In contrast, according to CEDS GBD-MAPS, BC emissions increased from 5.2 to 6 Tg per year between 2000 and 2010 and then witnessed a small decline of 0.3 Tg between 2010 and 2017. Nonetheless, both datasets suggest that global reductions in BC emissions are not on track as recommended by the IPCC to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement goal of limiting warming to below 1.5°C.

Figure 2.6 — Global black carbon emissions and relative contributions by sector from 2000 to 2017. (A) PKU-FUEL and (B) CEDS GBD-MAPS . Note: CEDS GBD-MAPS does not include emissions from wildfires.

Image
Chart

When examining emissions at the regional level as opposed to the global level, substantial disparities become evident. BC emissions have declined in Europe, North America, China, and other developed countries, as shown in Figure 2.7. Much of the recent decline in the northern hemisphere is attributable to China, where emissions dropped by 20% between 2010 and 2017. However, even with this decline, China accounted for approximately 18% of global BC emissions in 2017. In the United States, BC declined by 16% over that same timeframe primarily due to a large drop in transportation-related emissions following the implementation of stringent vehicle emission standards. In the European Union, BC emissions decreased by 6% over those seven years. However, this decrease was not uniform across member states. BC decreased by more than 15% in Italy, Norway, Sweden, Greece, and Belgium, but much lower in larger countries, such as Germany and France.

Figure 2.7 — Percent change in country-level anthropogenic black carbon emissions between 2010 and 2017. This does not include emissions from wildfires. Data: PKU-FUEL.

Image
Map

BC emissions across some low-and middle-income countries including Mexico, Algeria, Chad, Chile, and Mauritania also declined by more than 15% over the study period. Notably, Mexico and Chile are two of the few countries that have included reducing BC emissions in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) report, which outlines how each individual country plans to address climate change under the Paris Climate Agreement.

Unfortunately, these declines in BC have been tempered by increases in emissions in countries throughout Africa, South Asia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. In South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, which together account for 38% of total BC emissions, emissions increased by 8% between 2010 and 2017, mostly due to the consumption of unclean solid fuels for cooking and an increase in transportation. If emissions in these regions continue on a similar trend it will offset the gains made in North America, China, and the European Union making it unlikely that global BC will be significantly reduced by 2030, which is essential for reaching global net zero.

While Eastern Europe and Central Asia account for only 4% of global BC emissions, this region experienced an increase of 15% over the study period mostly stemming from the transportation and industry sectors. This is not surprising given that the average age of vehicles – older vehicles tend to be more polluting – is higher in these regions. For example, in all of Eastern Europe and in the Central Asian country of Kyrgyzstan the average car is more than 15 years old. By comparison, the average age of vehicles in Germany and China are 10 and 5 years, respectively.

Based on recent trends, such as the widespread adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles as well as the replacement of gas-powered residential heaters with electric heat pumps, it is likely that BC emissions in the European Union, North America, and China have continued to decline between 2017 and 2023.

However, BC emissions could still be on the rise in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. According to one study, global access to clean cooking fuels increased by a paltry 2% between 2015 to 2020, and the latest assessment by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network reveals that growth has been stagnant in sub-Saharan Africa. Meanwhile, transportation is growing rapidly in many places. This suggests that a decline in BC emissions between 2017 and 2023 is unlikely.

Section Number
2.0

Black Carbon: A Triple Threat

Black carbon (BC) – also referred to as soot – is a particulate matter that results from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass in industries, vehicles, cooking stoves, residential heating, and gas flaring. It is also emitted during forest fires and agricultural burning. As a major climate and air pollutant, BC emissions have widespread adverse effects on human health and climate change.

BC causes respiratory diseases and increases all-cause mortality. Recent epidemiological studies suggest that exposure to BC in particular, as opposed to undifferentiated particulate matter (PM2.5), can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease by six to twenty-six times, and reducing exposure to BC can increase life expectancy by four to nine times compared to PM2.5.

Globally, exposure to unhealthy levels of particulate matter – including BC – is estimated to cause between three and six million excess deaths every year. Out of 1,000 excess deaths from exposure to PM2.5, about 35 deaths can be attributed to BC alone. Country-level analyses in China, India, and the United States have shown that BC causes thousands of premature deaths every year.

These health impacts of BC are felt disproportionately by those living in low- and middle-income countries, notably in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, where solid fuel is used by 2.4 billion people for residential energy. The incomplete combustion of these fuels produces BC and a dangerous cocktail of other pollutants causing household indoor air pollution (HAP) that in some cases exceed World Health Organization (WHO) recommended levels by up to 100 times. Globally, HAP is estimated to cause about half of all the premature deaths associated with air pollution. 

Image

Globally, exposure to unhealthy levels of particulate matter – including BC – is estimated to cause between three and six million excess deaths every year.

By increasing health expenditures and removing people from the workforce, BC has significant economic ramifications. Estimates from China show that in 2017 short-term BC exposure caused economic losses of US$7.5 to $13.2 billion, and long-term exposure led to losses of US$53 to $93.2 billion – equivalent to between 0.4% and 0.8% of China's GDP that year. According to the World Bank, reliance on unclean cooking fuels – the largest source of BC – results in global economic losses in excess of US$2.4 trillion each year

BC also contributes to climate change through two distinct modes. First, by absorbing solar energy. BC is an extremely potent warming agent with a global warming potential (GWP) estimated to be several times greater than carbon dioxide. Over short timeframes, BC causes more warming than any other climate pollutant as shown in Figure 1.1. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR6 report, the current warming attributed to BC is roughly 0.1°C when compared to pre-industrial times, although there exists significant uncertainty surrounding this estimate.

Figure 1.1 — Temperature response by component for total anthropogenic emissions for a one-year pulse. In the short term, methane and black carbon dominate warming, while in the long run, carbon dioxide is the dominant warming agent. Reproduced from IPCC AR6 report (Figure 8.33).

Image

Second, BC ends up deposited onto ice which reduces albedo as it absorbs sunlight, thereby increasing snow melt and accelerating climate warming in snow-covered regions. This impact is felt acutely in the Arctic and Himalayas. In the Arctic, where temperatures increased by 1.5°C between 1976 and 2007, it has been estimated that increased atmospheric BC alone may have contributed 0.4°C of warming. Recent findings from the Himalayas and Hindu Kush mountains indicate that over 50 percent of the acceleration in glacier and snow melt can be attributed to BC deposits. In addition, BC emissions have been linked to alterations in the monsoon patterns across the Indian subcontinent and Tibetan Plateau.

Image

1.1 Reducing Black Carbon Emissions: A Win-Win for People and Climate 

Reducing BC emissions will have significant human well-being, climate, and economic benefits. Targets to reduce BC have the potential to prevent approximately four to twelve million premature deaths between 2015 and 2030, mostly in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. 

In sub-Saharan Africa – a hotspot of residential BC emissions – providing clean cooking fuel to reduce BC emissions could avert around 463,000 deaths every year (Figure 1.2). Furthermore, the socio-economic benefits far outweigh the cost of implementation as providing clean cooking fuel to every household in Africa could result in a total net benefit of US$78 billion, mostly in the form of improved health (Figure 1.2).

On average households can save nearly an hour a day by switching to clean fuel (Figure 1.2). This reduction in “time poverty” could provide family members, especially women and girls, the opportunity to pursue education and economic activities.

Figure 1.2 — Co-benefits of implementing clean cooking across sub-Saharan Africa. Data source: Khavari et al 2023.

Image
A graph showing the benefits of reducing black carbon

Co-benefits of implementing clean cooking across sub-Saharan Africa. Data source: Khavari et al 2023

Credit: Project Drawdown

Transitioning to clean cooking fuel has additional co-benefits. For example, unsustainable wood harvesting for cooking fuel has resulted in deforestation and biodiversity loss in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. East African countries such as Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda are a major hotspot of depleting sustainable woodfuel resources. In the Democratic Republic of Congo – the largest sub-Saharan country – 84% of harvested wood is used for charcoal or firewood. Therefore, solutions aimed at curbing BC can also reduce deforestation in these regions.

In urban areas, vehicle emissions stand out as a primary contributor to air pollution and the predominant source of BC, irrespective of whether it is a high-, middle-, or low-income country. For example, in the urban megalopolises of Delhi and Nairobi, transportation contributes more than 80% of BC for the majority of months. Similarly, in France and China, studies have shown strong correlations between road transportation and BC concentration. A major difference however between high- and low- and middle-income countries, is the significantly higher concentration of BC in cities in low- and middle-income countries compared to the high income countries.

Reducing BC emissions from transportation has the potential to substantially mitigate related morbidity and mortality, particularly in rapidly expanding urban areas in low- and middle-income countries which are seeing an exponential increase in vehicle demand.

The high short-term GWP of BC means that it can result in immediate climate impacts. The IPCC recommends deep reductions in BC emissions by 2030 to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement goal of limiting warming to below 1.5°C, yet very few countries have addressed BC emissions in their climate plans.

Universal access to clean cooking in Africa could lead to an annual greenhouse gas emissions reduction equivalent to 1% of global emissions.

Targeted reductions in BC can also result in regionally important climate improvements. Significant reductions in short-lived climate pollutants – including BC – can reduce Arctic warming between 2041 and 2050 by 0.4°C, which is vital for preserving the region’s ecosystems and avoiding critical environmental tipping points. Similarly, implementing rapid BC emissions reduction policies in South Asia can immediately slow glacier melting in the Himalayas and the Hindu Kush, preserving future water security for billions of people living in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan as well as mitigating the associated risks with rapid melting such as floods and landslides.

Additionally, reducing BC goes hand-in-hand with the reduction of other climate and air pollutants such as methane, carbon dioxide, particulate matter, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). For example, universal access to clean cooking in Africa  could lead to an annual greenhouse gas emissions reduction of 586 million tons of CO2-eq – approximately 1% of global yearly emissions.

Section Number
1.0
Image
Daniel Jasper
Image
Daniel Jasper

Dan is the policy advisor for Project Drawdown. Previously, he worked for the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), where he advocated for peace, humanitarian cooperation, and international development in Asia, and at World Learning, where he administered the state department's International Visitor Leadership Program. Founder and primary author of StreetCivics.com, Dan served in the Peace Corps in Turkmenistan from 2008 to 2010 and in Saint Lucia from 2013 to 2014. He has also worked for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Minnesota House of Representatives, and Congresswoman Betty McCollum. 

Subscribe to